Search Results for "IPC Section 376"

1221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Conduct. Conviction under Sections 366, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Conduct Inconsistent with Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Shailesh Mahadeo Lanjewar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for offences under Sections 366, 376(2)(f) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction in Revision — Sentence Reduced to 4 Years R.I. Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix Under Section 376 IPC. Minor Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence Do Not Warrant Acquittal as Testimony of Victim is Found Reliable and Trustworthy.

The applicant, Tekaram s/o Krishna Ghormare, was convicted under Section 376 IPC by the 2nd Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhandara on 18.12.2003 in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl — Rarest of Rare Case. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC for the brutal murder of a 4-year-old girl, finding the circumstantial evidence complete and the crime falling within the rarest of rare category.

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction. The accused, Ravi s/o Ashok Ghumare, was convicted by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused to Adduce Defence Evidence in POCSO Case — Rejection of Plea by Trial Court Set Aside. Right to Fair Trial Under Section 482 CrPC Includes Opportunity to Present Defence Witnesses Even After Prosecution Evidence Closed.

The petitioner, Sri Periyaswamy M., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Gang Rape Accused Despite 3-Year Incarceration, Citing Prima Facie Evidence and Seriousness of Offence Under Section 376(D) IPC. Speedy Trial Violation Claim Rejected as Charge Framed and Trial to Be Expedited.

The applicant, Nitesh Raghunath Lahange, filed a second bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release in connection with Crime No. I-1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Appa Ramrao Gavate, was convicted by the AdHoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Vijay Tulshiram Bangar (accused no.1) and Anil Sahadeo Wankhede (accused no.2) against their convictio...