Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

502 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 502 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Developer. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled, No Enforceable Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiffs, a group of 52 individuals, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of flats in a building to be constru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Official Liquidator to Adjudicate Workmen's Claims in Winding Up of KMA Ltd. Under Sections 529A and 530 of Companies Act, 1956. Industrial Court's Order on Unpaid Wages Held Binding on Official Liquidator.

The judgment concerns two company applications filed in the winding up of KMA Ltd. (in liquidation). Company Application No.593 of 2011 was filed by a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Official Liquidator to Adjudicate Workmen's Claims in Winding Up of KMA Ltd. Under Sections 529A and 530 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the Official Liquidator must consider the Industrial Court's order dated 2 July 2005 in adjudicating claims of workmen.

The judgment concerns two company applications filed in the winding up proceedings of KMA Ltd. (in liquidation). Company Application No. 593 of 2011 w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Cheating Case Against Company for Non-Payment of Maturity Amount Under Investment Scheme — Failure to Repay Loan Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC Without Deception at Inception.

The petitioner, Sol Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an order dated 3.6.2003 passed by the learn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute, Upholds Financer's Claim. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is not a jurisdictional issue under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the award is not patently illegal.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions: Arbitration Petition No. 783 of 2011 filed by the borrowers (M/s. Sahyadri Earthmovers and its partne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Foreign Award Execution Case Due to Property Location. Territorial jurisdiction for execution of foreign award under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is determined by location of property to be attached, not by place of cause of action.

The appellant, Wireless Developers Inc., a US company, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Indiagames Ltd., an Indian company, f...