Search Results for "Article 181"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Reference of Industrial Dispute as Stale After 14-Year Delay. Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Vitiated Due to Inordinate Delay Without Justification.

The petitioner, M/s Bata India Limited, challenged an order of reference dated 31.03.2015 made by the State Government under Section 10 of the Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.

The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Filed by 23 Accused Convicted for Murder, Rioting, and Damaging Property Under IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Offences Including Section 302 r/w 149 IPC, Stemming from Inter-Community Political Violence in Village Talaghar.

These four criminal appeals, heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, arise from Sessions Case No.79 of 2004 decided by the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4044 OF 2015

These are a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioners are various tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to CIDCO's Demand for Premium on Additional FSI in Waluj Growth Centre; Petitioners Argue Sanctioned DCR Provides Basic FSI of 1.5 and No Premium is Chargeable, While CIDCO Contends Unauthorized Construction and Suppression of Facts

The petitioners, three individuals engaged in business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging communication...