Search Results for "theft charge"

629 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 629 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Civil Nature of Dispute. FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 504, 506 IPC quashed as allegations were vague and the dispute was civil.

The petitioners, C. Ganesh Narayan and Vidya Nataraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Sheikh Mehboob Sheikh Hussain, was convicted by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur, in Special Criminal Case No.47/2001 und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside Police Station, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Death Sentence Case Under IPC Sections 302 and 449 - Review jurisdiction limited to errors apparent on the record; no rehearing or re-appreciation of evidence permitted under Article 137 of the Constitution and Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court of India, in a review petition filed under Article 137 of the Constitution, dismissed a challenge to its earlier judgment affirming ...