Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Sale Deed Challenged as Void for Non-Compliance with Section 7 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, but Court Found No Substantial Question of Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Navinchand Khushalchand Mutha against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in a suit for de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Public Tender. Court upholds Tender Evaluation Committee's decision that petitioner failed to meet essential eligibility condition regarding submission of work completion certificate for similar work.

The petitioner, Dinesh Gopal Keny, a registered Class IA contractor with over three decades of experience, challenged the rejection of his technical b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 54 OF 2012

The matter involved two appeals from orders arising out of Special Civil Suit No.2/2012 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...