GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "section 376"
1813 result(s) found
Found 1813 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
26 Nov 2010The appellant, Ananda Tatyaba Kadam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the ...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Murder of a Minor Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the last seen together theory coupled with medical evidence and motive established guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
5 Mar 2012The case involves the conviction of Prashant Appasaheb Kate for the rape and murder of a six-year-old girl, Pranita, in Kaudgaon, Maharashtra. The app...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
12 Jul 2016The appellant, Akhtar s/o Abaskhan Pathan, was charged with offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in Sessions Case ...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC — Evidence of Victim and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(i) IPC and Sections 5(j)(ii), 5(n) POCSO Act sustained as victim's testimony credible and corroborated by medical evidence; delay in FIR explained.
2 Aug 2023The appellant, Dnyandeo Bhujang Dahiphale, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Ahmednagar on 24.02.2016 for offences under Section 376...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.
22 Sep 2022The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case, Upholds Tribunal's Selection of Comparables. The Court held that the Tribunal's exclusion and inclusion of comparables based on functional analysis was correct and did not give rise to a substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
12 Sep 2022The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appel...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Penetration Established by Medical Evidence. The court held that slight penetration is sufficient for rape and the medical evidence corroborated the victim's testimony.
8 Sep 2011The appellant, Mohammed Gaus Ibrahim Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Rape Cases Based on Promise of Marriage. Distinguishes Between Breach of Promise and False Promise Under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.
30 Jul 2015The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard three applications for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...
- 169
High Court
KAHC010383542014_1
7 Jun 2024The appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 12.06.2014 and order of sentence dated 17...
