Search Results for "section 33(4)"

534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Extension of Letter of Intent for Mining Lease. Court upholds State's decision that extension cannot be granted beyond the maximum period of five years under Rule 7(4) of the Minerals (Evidence of Mineral Contents) Rules, 2015.

The petitioner, Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited, a cement manufacturing company, participated in a bid process initiated by the State of Maharashtra fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Higher Award by Tribunal. Multiplier Error Corrected but Tribunal's Award Already Exceeded Recalculated Amount, Hence No Enhancement Granted.

The present appeal was filed by the heirs of the deceased Pareshbhai Bhagvanjibhai Madhani under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Rohitbhai Matambhai Revabhai Bharwad, was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Patan, vide order dated 23.01.2026, as a '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Release of Arrested Cargo in Admiralty Suit for Demurrage Claim. Demurrage Claim Under Voyage Charterparty is a Claim in Respect of Goods Under Section 4(1)(f) of Admiralty Act, 2017, and Arrest of Cargo is Permissible Even if Not on Board.

The Plaintiff, Pacific Gulf Shipping (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-based company engaged in vessel chartering, filed an admiralty suit against De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears State Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing Development Charge Deduction. The Single Judge had declared that applying a blanket 33.33% deduction towards development charges in land acquisition compensation awards was impermissible without justification.

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard three connected writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials against a common order da...