Search Results for "partnership business"

1796 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1796 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Rejection of Secondary Evidence Application. Court sets aside trial court order and permits plaintiffs to lead secondary evidence of lost agreement under Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The petitioners, Om Health Centres Pvt Ltd and its director N. Prabhakar Rao, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Shareholder Dispute Under Arbitration Act. Court finds existence of arbitration clause and refers parties to arbitration, appointing former judge as sole arbitrator.

The petitioners, shareholders of a company, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Builder’s Writ Petition Challenging NCDRC’s Rejection of Condonation of 1132-Day Delay; No Perversity Found. Delay in Appeal Against State Commission Order Not Sufficiently Explained Under Section 23 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, a construction firm and its partners, launched a real estate project and received an investment of Rs. 6,50,000/- from the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute Involving 'Ajanta' Toothpaste. The Court Examines Claims of Prior Use Where Plaintiffs Alleged Sales from June 2002 and Defendants from December 2002.

Background: The dispute concerned the use of the trade mark 'Ajanta' for toothpaste. The plaintiffs claimed to be prior users of the mark for non-medi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Temporary Injunction to Restrain Alienation Pending Suit is Necessary Despite Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Court Revisits Its Earlier Decision in Sharad Mor's Case in the Context of Multiple Appeals from Orders Refusing Injunctions.

These appeals raised a common question about the necessity of granting a temporary injunction to restrain a defendant from creating third party intere...