Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Lack of Notification Under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Acquisition Proceedings for Resettlement of Project-Affected Persons Found Void Due to Non-Declaration of Affected and Benefitted Zones.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by eleven agriculturists whose lands in Bhendegaon Khurd village we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor Under Section 144 CPC When Decree Varied and Decree Holder Purchased Property in Auction. Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Variation of Decree and Lack of Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

The appeal arose from a restitution application under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The original plaintiff (decree holder) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Lead Evidence First in Property Dispute with Wife — Order 18 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Interpreted. Husband Must Prove His Case as He Would Be Defeated if No Evidence Is Given, Given His Admission of Wife's Payment.

The case involves a property dispute between husband and wife. The wife filed a petition seeking a declaration that she is the sole owner of one of tw...