Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"

1317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals Against ITAT Order Dismissing Appeals in Limine for Non-Prosecution. Tribunal Must Decide Appeals on Merits Under Rule 24 of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 When Assessee Absent.

The appellant, M/s. Daryapur Shetkari Sahakari Ginning and Pressing Factory, a cooperative society, filed three appeals before the High Court of Judic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Application for Reference in Co-operative Bank Deduction Case. Interest on Government Securities Earmarked Against Statutory Reserve Fund Held Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City III, against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Kotwals' Writ Petition Against Age Bar; Applies COVID-19 Relaxation GR to Group D Absorption. The Court Found That Government Resolution Dated 17.12.2021 Should Be Interpreted Liberally to Include All Kotwals Affected by Recruitment Delays, Ensuring No Anomalous Exclusion.

The petitioners, eleven Kotwals working on honorarium in Aurangabad district, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order ...