Search Results for "composite Bombay State"

527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Ruling in Distributor Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Extended by Conduct Despite Continued Commercial Dealings Post-Expiry of Two-Year Term.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Raymond Limited against an order of the lea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Doctor in PC & PNDT Act Case for Lack of Sanction — Prosecution Initiated Without Valid Authorization Under Section 28 of PC & PNDT Act, 1994

The applicant, Dr. Udaysingh Mansingh Patil, a medical practitioner, was charged by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — No Deceptive Similarity Between 'Palm Grove' and 'Royal Palms' Hotels. Plaintiff's use of 'Palm Grove' always in combination with 'Ramada' and delay disentitled it to interim relief.

The Plaintiff, Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd., owned and operated a mid-range hotel in Juhu, Mumbai, under the name 'Ramada Plaza Palm Grove' (prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partnership Act Bar Case — Agreement Held as Licence Not Lease. Suit for Eviction by Unregistered Partnership Firm Not Barred Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Right to Evict Trespasser Arises from Common Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by M/s Hotel Satkar, an unregistered partnership firm, against the dismissal of their suit for eviction of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Amendment Application in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After 11 Years and After Commencement of Trial Held Not Bonafide and Would Cause Prejudice to Opposite Party.

The petitioners, who were defendants in Special Civil Suit No.123 of 1990 filed by the predecessor of respondents No.1 to 8, challenged the order date...