Search Results for "burden under Section 106"

1119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Registered Will in Hindu Succession Partition Appeal. Central Issue Is Whether Will Dated 15.12.1976 Is Proved Valid, Determining Devolution Under Section 15(2)(b) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

This civil appeal arose from a family succession and partition dispute concerning the properties of one Vaiyapuri Gounder, who had three wives. The fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Testamentary Suit Seeking Probate of Will Due to Forgery and Undue Influence. The Court Held That the Propounders Failed to Prove Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity, and That the Earlier Charitable Will Remained Unrevoked.

This testamentary suit arose from a petition for probate of the alleged last will of Jimmy Keki Tarachand, dated 27 December 2004. The original plaint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.

The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...