Search Results for "award after expiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "award after expiry"

1378 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1378 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Group Mediclaim Dispute — Lack of Jurisdiction and No Merit Found. The District Court at Pune lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the seat of arbitration was Mumbai, and the insurer failed to appear before the arbitrator despite notice.

27 Nov 2018

The case involves a challenge by United India Insurance Company Ltd. (the petitioner) against an arbitral award passed in favor of Kalyani Avinash Gok...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Teacher. Teacher's Appointment as Shikshan Sevak was valid and termination without prior approval under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 was illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two writ petitions: one filed by the management (Madha Taluka Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and K.N. Bhise Arts & Commerce College) c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award as Barred by Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Petitions Filed Beyond Three Months from Receipt of Supplementary Award Cannot Be Entertained.

30 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. P.C.V. Traders and M/s. M.C. Vora and Co., filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal Against Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Liberal Approach to Allowing Amendment for Enhancing Damages After 31 Years Upheld, with Issue of Limitation Kept Open for Trial Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

1 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, where the appellant, Life Insurance Corporation of India,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

16 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Motor Vehicle Accident Cases — Tribunal Erred in Returning Claim Petitions for Lack of Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is determined by place of accident, residence of claimants, or business of insurer; Tribunal must not return petitions on ground of territorial jurisdiction without considering all options.

17 Jul 2018

The judgment pertains to two Miscellaneous First Appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award da...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Motor Vehicle Accident Cases — Tribunal Erred in Returning Claim Petitions for Lack of Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction under Section 166(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is determined by claimant's choice of place of residence or business, not by accident location.

17 Jul 2018

The judgment pertains to two Miscellaneous First Appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Delay Condonation Applications in Section 34 Arbitration Petitions — Delay Beyond 30 Days Not Condonable Under Section 34(3) Proviso. The court strictly interpreted Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that delays exceeding 30 days beyond the three-month limitation period cannot be condoned, leading to dismissal of multiple arbitration petitions.

20 Aug 2019

The judgment concerns multiple notices of motion filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) seeking condonation of delay in filing arbitration petit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

1 Jan 2026

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

46 47 48 49 50

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)