Search Results for "Spot Panchnama"

1674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Uncorroborated Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Sole Testimony of Son of Deceased Lacks Independent Corroboration and Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by the accused challenging their conviction under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 504, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 15th July, 2003 passed by the 4th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by Tribunal — Tribunal Failed to Consider Evidence and Wrongly Dismissed Claim Petition for Want of Proof of Negligence.

The appellants, being the children and mother of the deceased Mahebub Chand Shaikh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rakesh @ Bhaiya Shambhuprasad Gupta, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No.206 of 2012 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence fails as prosecution unable to prove motive or establish chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Janabai, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of her daughter-in-law Meerabai and sentenced to life imprisonment. The pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows State Appeal Against Release on Probation in Motor Vehicles Act Case. Section 184 Conviction Requires Mandatory Sentence of Imprisonment or Fine, Not Probation.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the order of the Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhusawal, dated 31st May 2003 in Summary Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010224592017_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Death of 15-Year-Old Boy Due to Contributory Negligence. Owner of Tractor Held Liable for Negligence of Driver but Compensation Reduced by 50% for Deceased's Contributory Negligence in Sitting on Tractor.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the original claimants (respondents No. 1 to 4) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988...