Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

525 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 525 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Stay Order in Transfer Dispute — Zilla Parishad Employee's Refusal to Accept Transfer Not an Unfair Labour Practice. Absorption Order Due to Abolition of Post Upheld as Transfer Not Covered Under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, and its health officers, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement of Workman. Domestic Inquiry Held Fair and Punishment of Dismissal Upheld as Not Disproportionate Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, a registered trade union, challenged the Award dated 8th April 1994 (Part-I) and Award dated 7th Apr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Minimum Wages. Establishment Classified as Engineering Industry Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Entitling Workers to Minimum Wages and Attendance-cum-Wage Cards.

The case involves a writ petition filed by M/s Asia Foundation & Construction Limited challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, dated 12/1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Petitioner Failed to Prove Employee-Employer Relationship with Respondent Company.

The petitioner, Ramesh Bhalchandra Chavre, filed a complaint under Section 28(1) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfa...