Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on MSMED Act to Larger Bench. Balancing statutory remedies with writ jurisdiction: Supreme Court deliberates over MSMED Act provisions and alternative remedies.

The Supreme Court of India examines whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order passed by the Micro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Trial and First Appellate Court. High Court's Reversal Set Aside for Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Second Appeal Scope Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over possession of agricultural land. The plaintiff, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, filed a suit for recovery of possession based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Lakshman, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...