Madras High Court Passes Common Order on Petitions Seeking Cancellation of Bail under BNSS, 2023 in CBI Transferred Case. Bail Granted by Sessions Court in Cr.No.27 of 2025 Challenged After Transfer of Investigation to CBI.
20 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Illegal gratification"
483 result(s) found
Found 483 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
7 Jul 2026The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Sericulture Officers in Misappropriation Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Renders Prosecution Invalid. Criminal proceedings under Sections 409 and 420 IPC against public servants quashed for want of prior sanction as required under Section 197 of CrPC, as the alleged acts were committed in discharge of official duties.
10 Sep 2018The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by public servants working as Sericulture Inspectors and a retired Deputy Director of Sericulture in K...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
12 Jun 2018The appellant, Sukhdeo Laxman Parale, was a Talathi (village revenue officer) in Phulumri, Yavatmal. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
5 Mar 2018The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act Must Be Obtained Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and the Special Judge erred in directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.
1 Apr 2016The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Required Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court clarified that under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sanction is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and set aside the trial court's order directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.
1 Apr 2016The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga (Crl.RP No.659/2008) and another by the a...
- 76
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pontiff's Appeal Against FIR Quashing in Criminal Defamation Case — Allegations of Sexual Assault and Criminal Intimidation by a Seer Against a Woman and Her Family Not Quashed at Threshold.
9 Feb 2015The appellant, a 39-year-old pontiff of Shree Samsthana Gokarna – Shree Ramachandrapura Mutta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Article 2...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Private Complaint Against Former Chief Minister for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for prosecution of public servants is mandatory and absence of valid sanction renders complaint not maintainable.
21 May 2013The petitioner, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, sought quashing of a private complaint filed by the respondent before the XXIII Additional City ...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal; Bribery by Police Officer Not Under Colour of Duty, Limitation Under Bombay Police Act Section 161(1) Inapplicable. Conviction of Police Head Constable for Accepting Bribe Restored as Act Not Connected with Official Duty.
14 Mar 1966Background: The case arose from a criminal appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of a police head constable by the Bombay High Cour...
- 26
