Search Results for "Hurt"

1330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and uncorroborated by medical evidence.

The appellants, Santosh Hindurao Pawar, Santosh Vitthal Nalawade, and Bhuvaneshwar Babubhai Patil, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Najir Kadar Mujawar, was originally accused No.4 in a murder case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. He was convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as evidence of PW-1 Maruti Koli was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Yusuf Alamash Daryavardi (appellant No.1) and Arjun Bhima Jadhav (appellant No.2), were convicted by the Sessions Court, Sangli, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt and Unlawful Restraint in Midnight Shooting Incident. Accused's Claim of Private Defence Rejected as Disproportionate and Unsubstantiated.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by four accused persons (one deceased) challenging their conviction and sentence by the Judici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by two accused, Ashok Barkya Dalvi and Paresh Bhiku Bhandari, against their conviction by the III Additional Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Arms License Revocation Based on Pre-Renewal Incident. License Renewal After Incident Precludes Revocation on Same Ground Under Arms Act, 1959.

The petitioner, a holder of an arms license under the Arms Act, 1959 since 1999, had his license renewed in February 2003. Prior to renewal, a crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Assault Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Sections 323, 326, 452 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Suresh Trambak Salve and Dnayaneshwar Trambak Salve, were convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.409 of 1999 filed by the accused (Kadar Tolan Bagwan and others) against their conviction under Sect...