Search Results for "Extended limitation"

1862 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1862 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ITAT Order Rejecting Rectification Application as Time-Barred. Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Does Not Confer Power to Condon Delay Beyond Six Months.

The petitioner, Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 03 November 2023, which di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Electricity Act Case — Limitation Period for Appeal Under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2003 is 30 Days but Appellate Authority Has Power to Condon Delay.

The petitioner, Adani Power Maharashtra Limited, challenged an order dated 6.4.2009 passed by the Superintending Engineer, Nagpur Region, Electrical I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Liability. Complainant Bank Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Bidar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Girish Kulkarni, by the trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Sales Tax Officer, Jabalpur in Reassessment Limitation Case. Reassessment Notice Under MP General Sales Tax Act, 1958 Held Time-Barred as Proviso to Section 19(1) Preserved Limitation Period of Three Years Under Repealed Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings initiated under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, which had repealed the Central Provinc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act as Time-Barred; Notice Dispatched on 1st April 2021 Beyond Limitation. Reopening Based on Accommodation Entry Information Without Independent Material Held Invalid for AY 2013-14.

The petitioner, a proprietor of a petrol bunk, challenged a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013...