KAHC010422252008_1
17 Dec 2014...
Search Results for "Central Government employee"
2150 result(s) found
Found 2150 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.
17 Dec 2014On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to ONGC Promotion Regulations and Supercession of Scheduled Caste Employee. The court examines whether the arbitrary change in promotion criteria without amending the Modified Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 1980, violates the statutory scheme and results in unjust supercession of the SC employee.
22 Sep 2017The judgment arose from four writ petitions filed by employees of the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) challenging their supercession in...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Ordnance Factory Labourer Seeking Full Salary for Suspension Period Following Acquittal — Period of Suspension Must Be Treated as Duty for All Purposes Under Fundamental Rule 54-B(3) When Acquittal Is Based on Full Trial on Merits.
5 Sep 2022The petitioner, Gopal S/o Sitaram Bairisal, a retired labourer from Ordnance Factory, Ambazari, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Cen...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Partially Allows Appeal Against Quantum of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim; Ex Gratia Payment Deducted to Prevent Double Benefit. Court Modifies Non-Pecuniary Damages Awarded by Tribunal Conforming to Supreme Court Guidelines in Pranay Sethi, Reducing Compensation by Rs.10 Lakh Ex Gratia Payment and Adjusting Consortium and Funeral Expenses.
29 Jul 2019The present appeal arose from the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar in MACP No. 407 of 2012, whereby the claim peti...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Colour Blindness Case — Termination of Driver Violates Section 47 of Disabilities Act. Employer Cannot Discharge Employee Who Acquired Disability During Service; Must Provide Alternative Post or Retain with Same Pay.
19 Oct 2011The Union of India and other petitioners challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 24.02.2011 which allowed the Original ...
- 158
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
16 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...
- 534
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Secret Ballot Method for Ascertaining Trade Union Majority at Mormugao Port Trust. Petitioner Union Argued That Check-Off System Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 and Code of Discipline Should Prevail.
3 May 2011The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the Mormugao Port and Railway Workers' Union, a trade union registered under the ...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councilor for Office of Profit — Secretary of Watershed Committee Not an Office of Profit Under Section 16(1)(h) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the position of Secretary of a Watershed Management Committee with an honorarium of Rs.3,000 per month does not constitute an office of profit under the Act.
31 Jul 2019The petitioner, Bhagwat Digambarrao Uphad, was elected as a Councilor of the Zilla Parishad. Respondent No.6, Vikram Hanumantrao Uphad, filed an appli...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Welfare Fund Cess as Unconstitutional. Levy under Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 held to be a fee for services rendered, not a tax, and validly imposed on establishments including those with contract labour.
17 Oct 2025The petitioner, Mohan Dhotre, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the levy under the Maharashtra La...
- 149
