Search Results for "window period"

593 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Uncorroborated Evidence. Conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC set aside as the fatal injury was not intentionally caused and the prosecution failed to prove common intention.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by three appellants (Santosh, Sushil, and Devindrappa) against their conviction under Sections 304 Part I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Proviso to Section 115JB(6) of Income Tax Act in SEZ Cases. The court held that the proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2011 is not ultra vires the SEZ Act and is valid and enforceable.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by companies operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) challenging the constitutional validity of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Holds Contempt Petition Maintainable During Pendency of Writ Appeal Without Stay. Respondent's Failure to Restore Cheque Signing Power to Panchayat President Despite Court Order Amounts to Wilful Disobedience.

The contempt petition arose from a writ order that quashed the withdrawal of the petitioner's cheque signing power as President of Palayanur Village P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Accused in Second FIR Case Due to Impermissibility of Multiple FIRs for Same Incident. Second FIR for Offences Under Sections 504, 332, 353 IPC Arising from Same Occurrence of Unauthorised Buntings Removal Held Inadmissible, Following T.T. Antony Principle.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered at Hosakot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 48 of Arbitration Act. Challenges to Award Based on Public Policy and Lack of Notice Were Dismissed by Executing Court.

The respondent, a Korean company, chartered a vessel to the petitioner, an Indian firm, under a Charter Party dated 12.05.2004. Disputes arose over fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay Considers Challenge to Revised Guidelines for Grant of Offshore Exploration Licence. Petitioner Argues Notification Violates Section 35 of Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 and Article 14.

The writ petition was filed by Rare(H) Minerals Private Limited, a company engaged in prospecting and exploration, challenging the Notification (Revis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes Public Interest Litigation with Directions to Enforce Tribal Land Transfer Restrictions. Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Prohibition 'or otherwise' Encompasses Development Agreements and Powers of Attorney to Prevent Alienation of Tribal Land.

Background: The petitioner, a registered tribal welfare organization, filed this Public Interest Litigation raising concern over illegal transfers of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Application in Passing Off Action Over Mark 'Indiacom' vs 'Indicom'. Court Holds That Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Passing Off or Deceptive Similarity Between 'Indiacom' and 'Indicom', and Balance of Convenience Favoured Defendant.

The dispute arose from a passing off action filed by Indiacom Limited (plaintiff) seeking to restrain Tata Teleservices Ltd. and others (defendants) f...