WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000
18 Oct 2005Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...
Search Results for "prior demand and refusal"
758 result(s) found
Found 758 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Occupier's Challenge to Deposit Condition in Property Tax Appeal. Section 217(5) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Allows Appellate Court to Impose Deposit Condition Despite Section 209(3) Limitation on Occupier's Liability.
21 Jul 2011The petitioners, Dena Bank and its manager, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26 March 2...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Failure to Prove Possession.
26 Feb 2021The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, which affirmed ...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent's Limitation Objection Rejected as Debt Acknowledged Within Limitation Period, Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator.
8 Jun 2026The petitioner, Oil Field Instrumentation India Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking ap...
- 199
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
4 Apr 2025The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...
- 313
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.
23 Feb 2024The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...
- 47
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Patent Refusal for Lack of Inventive Step and Enablement. Controller's order upheld as amended claims were not enabled and lacked inventive step under Patents Act, 1970.
29 Jan 2025The appellant, Caleb Suresh Motupalli, filed a patent application for an invention titled 'Necktie Persona-Extender/Environment-integrator and method ...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Land Due to Limitation and Lack of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff's claim for 15% share in property fails as suit filed beyond limitation period and plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract.
19 Oct 2012The plaintiff, Kantilal Vasanji Chheda, filed a suit in 1994 seeking a declaration that an agreement dated 10th April 1981 for purchase of an open plo...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit — Lease Deed Interpretation and Rent Arrears Calculation. Landlord's Unilateral Adjustment of Security Deposit Held Invalid; Notice of Demand Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act Not Proven.
23 Oct 2012The appellant, Chandiram Dariyanumal Ahuja, was a tenant of a shop block owned by the respondent, Akola Zilla Shram Wahtuk Sahakari Sanstha, under a l...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.
18 Jan 2023The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...
- 64
