Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Order Granting Temporary Injunction in Tenant Dispute. District Judge's Power to Reappreciate Evidence in Injunction Appeals Upheld Under Order 39 CPC.

The petitioners, Abidbhai and Musabhai, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 17th January 2014 passed by the District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Co-owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Another Co-owner Without Ouster Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Suresh Chatra, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Execution Petition — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Not Applicable to Orders Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. First Appellate Court Directed to Consider Condonation of Delay Application on Merits Before Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred.

This second appeal was filed by the decree-holder in HRC 4/78 against the rejection of his execution petition in Exn.P.162/90 and the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Tenant's Revision Petition, Upholds Eviction Due to Unauthorized Change of User. Change from Doctor's Consulting Room to Lawyer's Office Held as Material Ground for Eviction Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

This revision petition arose from an eviction dispute concerning a tenanted room in a building owned by the Shripant Bhavan Charity Trust, the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Ownership Acquired After 31 December 1958 Does Not Entitle Landholder to Seek Possession Under Section 44 of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

This writ petition arose from a tenancy dispute under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The petitioner, Subhash Bagal, claimed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order That Tenants Cannot Purchase Trust Lands Under BT & AL Act. Property Registered as Public Trust Exempts It from Statutory Purchase Provisions Under Section 88B of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The dispute concerned agricultural lands in Sangli district that were originally Deosthan Inam lands. The tenant claimed right to purchase under the B...