Search Results for "flat rate"

941 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 941 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against CIRP Admission as Withdrawn. Shareholder's Challenge to Section 7 IBC Initiation on Grounds of Malicious Intent Under Section 65 IBC Not Maintainable as Appeal Was Withdrawn.

The appellant, Dr. Aveena Gudapati, filed an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai challenging an order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Petitioner for Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession and Commercial Quantity. Court holds that mere presence in a vehicle with contraband does not constitute possession under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act without proof of knowledge and control.

The petitioner, Mr. Kalam Narendra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admit Second Appeals Challenging First Appellate Court's Reversal of Money Decree. Substantial Questions of Law Framed on Whether First Appellate Court Properly Considered Trial Court Findings and Whether Its Findings Were Perverse.

The appellants filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 74,37,500 against the respondent based on a memorandum of understanding executed on 01.01.2011...