Search Results for "firm name"

2393 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2393 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Rectification Petition Filed by Le Shark Apparel Limited Seeking Cancellation of Respondents' Registered Trade Mark No. 466002 in Class 25. Petition Based on Grounds of Non-Use Under Section 47 and Fraudulent Registration Under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Le Shark Apparel Limited, filed a Commercial Miscellaneous Petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking rectification of the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Onion Trade Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Transaction and Lack of Criminal Intent. The court held that the ingredients of cheating under Section 420 IPC were not made out as there was no initial dishonest intention, and the dispute was purely civil.

The applicants, Thirumalai Prabhu R. and Vinodhini Prabhu Titumalai, proprietors/partners of M/s. Shreejith Traders in Tamilnadu, filed a criminal app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cheque Dishonour Proceedings Against Partners Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to satisfy requirements of Section 141 of the Act for imputing liability on partners.

The petitioners, accused No.1 (M/s. Conserve Ready Mix Concrete, a partnership firm) and accused No.2 and 3 (partners of the firm), filed a petition u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.

The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award Filed by Non-Guardian of Minor, Remands Claim Petition. Absence of Proper Representation of Minor Vitiated Compromise, and Compensation Was Not Determined as Per Law.

A minor child and her paternal grandmother (as next friend) approached the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 173(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...