Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1757 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1757 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to MRT Order on Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings. Earlier Dismissal for Default Does Not Bar Subsequent Proceedings Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ashish Chandrasingh Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 2nd November, 2018 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SDO and MRT Orders in Tenancy Dispute for Non-Consideration of Limitation Issue. Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Jamatul Muslimin Jama Mashid Mandiwali, claimed that suit land Survey No.85/1 admeasuring 0.34 Gunthas in village Mandivali, Taluka D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Competent Authority's Order for Possession Upheld Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.

The petitioner, AMI Merchandising Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the judgment and order dated 14/0...