Search Results for "award quashing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "award quashing"

1054 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1054 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition in Service Dispute - Backwages Reduced from Full to 50% for Conductor. Labour Court's award of full backwages from 1966 to 1991 set aside as workman failed to prove unemployment; 50% backwages granted instead.

13 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Rangnath Eknath Gadhe, a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the order of the Labour Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Claimant's husband aged 60 years, retired, earning pension; Tribunal erred by applying multiplier of 14 instead of 9 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121.

2 Feb 2011

The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award dated 1.4.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deeds and Potential for Development. The court upheld the Reference Court's enhancement of compensation from Rs. 4,000-6,000 per hectare to Rs. 12,000 per hectare under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on comparable sale deeds and rejecting the State's contention that the lands had no development potential.

30 Nov -0001

The State of Maharashtra filed six first appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the common judgment and award of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Award of Quality Audit Contract Without Tenders. Quality Audit of Roads Held Not Covered Under Section 72 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as It Is a Professional Service, Not Execution of Work or Supply of Goods.

14 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Niyaz Ahmed Vanu, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the award of a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Continuing Breach of Settlement Not Barred by Limitation Under MRTU & PULP Act. Non-Payment of Monthly Dues Constitutes Fresh Cause of Action Each Month, Complaint Filed Within 90 Days of Last Refusal.

20 Nov 2019

The Petitioner, Jaihind Sahakari Pani Purvatha Mandali Ltd., a registered co-operative society supplying water to agriculturists, challenged a judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Award for LED Street Lighting Project — No Arbitrariness Found in Municipal Corporation's Decision to Award Contract to Lowest Bidder. The court held that the tender process was fair and transparent, and the petitioners failed to establish any violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioners, Shah Investments and Polycab Wires, challenged the decision of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation to award a contract for LED stree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

22 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Application for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court Holds That Under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Jurisdiction Lies With the Court Where Arbitration Is Conducted, Not Where the Petitioner Resides.

12 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Ravindra Balaji Govindwar, challenged an arbitral award dated 21.12.2013 passed by the arbitrator (respondent no. 6) in proceeding...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Resolution Declaring Petitioner Ineligible to Bid for Sand Blocks in Palguni River — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Blacklisting Petitioner Renders Resolution Void.

25 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Sri Rajeeva, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Benga...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under 1894 Act — Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Not Applicable as Award Passed Before 2013 Act Commencement. The court held that acquisition proceedings culminating with an award dated 04.03.1999 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be challenged under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Savitaben Wd/o Narsinhbhai Somabhai Padhiyar and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution bef...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)