Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

660 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 660 result(s)

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against CIRP Admission Due to 45-Day Delay Without Sufficient Cause Under Section 61(2) of IBC. The appeal against admission of corporate debtor into CIRP was dismissed as time-barred, with the court holding that the delay of 45 days beyond the statutory period was not satisfactorily explained.

18 Dec 2024

The judgment pertains to two connected company appeals filed by Kalyan Muppaneni, the suspended director and founder shareholder of M/s. Pi Data Cente...

High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under 2013 Act. Compensation Must Be Determined as per Market Value Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Without Applying Theory of Dediction from Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as per Section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

27 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for widening and four-laning of National Highway No.12-A in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, under The Right t...

High Court

High Court Quashes Order in Section 34 Arbitration Application Due to Lack of Notice to Claimants. Failure to Issue Notice to Opposite Party Before Passing Order Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

14 Sep 2023

The petitioners, legal representatives of late Shivarama Gujjal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint and Summons in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice and Non-Compliance with Section 138 NI Act. The court held that the demand notice must be sent to the correct address of the drawer and that directors cannot be held liable without specific averments regarding their role.

26 Apr 2019

The petitioners, M/s Serve & Volley Outdoor Advertising Pvt Ltd and its directors, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

High Court

"Judgment Debtor’s Liability to Pay Interest Clarified: Deposit in Appellate Court Does Not Cease Accrual of Interest" "Bombay High Court reiterates the conditions for cessation of interest under Order XXI, Rule 1 of CPC."

11 Nov 2024

This case examines the cessation of interest on a decretal amount deposited by the judgment debtor in an appellate court, rather than the executing co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Upholds Solatium and Interest Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court affirms that land owners are entitled to solatium and statutory interest based on binding Supreme Court precedent.

3 Jul 2025

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Restoring Dealership Due to Perversity and Ignoring Material Evidence. The court held that the Arbitrator's finding that termination was unjustified was contrary to the evidence and the terms of the dealership agreement, and the award was perverse under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Aug 2012

The case involves a challenge by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Petitioner) against an Arbitral Award dated 25 June 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator....

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Wear and Tear Exclusion Not Applicable to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the bearing failure was due to wear and tear, and the breakdown was a fortuitous event covered under the Industrial All Risk Policy.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, was in the business of pesticides and chemicals. It purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE Packaged Power ...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)