Search Results for "arbitrary discretionary power"

776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in E-Auction Dispute Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Arbitrariness. Connectivity failure at service provider's end justified resumption of auction; High Court's interference in commercial decision set aside.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had quashed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court of Bombay: Commercial Arbitration Appeal" "Exploring the scope of judicial review under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing readiness, willingness, and compensation issues in a shareholder dispute."

Arbitration Scope: The Court clarified the restrictive jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...