Search Results for "Trial Fairness"

978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 read with Section 34, 120B, and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, with life imprisonment and concurrent sentences, as evidence formed a complete chain excluding innocence.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence of two appellants for offences under the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Culpable Homicide Case, Dismisses State Appeal for Murder. The court held that the act of causing death without intention to murder falls under Section 304 Part II IPC, and acquittal under Section 302 IPC was proper.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals: Criminal Appeal No.237/2009 filed by the original accused (Arun Gabhaji Pakade, Ankush Arun Pakade, Panchf...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Impleadment of Liquidator in Pending Salary Recovery Suit -- Interprets IBC Provisions on Continuation of Proceedings Post-Liquidation -- Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Chamber Summons

The Petitioner, a former employee of Respondent No.1 company, had filed a Summary Suit in 2017 for recovery of salary dues -- After the company went i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Section 313 Cr.P.C. Statements in Murder Trial Due to Failure to Put Incriminating Circumstances to Accused. Sessions Judge's Questions Were Vague and Did Not Comply with Mandate of Section 313 Cr.P.C. to Afford Accused Opportunity to Explain Incriminating Evidence.

The petitioners, accused No.1 and 2 in Sessions Case No.10/2018 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru, faced trial for ...