Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8638 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8638 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Order Rejecting Decree on Admission in Partition Suit Among Siblings. Trial Court's Rejection of Order XII Rule 6 CPC Application Based on Conditional Admission Under Scrutiny.

The petitioners, the original plaintiffs, and the respondent, the original defendant, are siblings who jointly inherited suit property from their pare...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petition Against Pensionary Benefits for Daily Wagers Made Permanent. Past Daily Wage Service Counts as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Chief Executive Officer of Vita Nagar Parishad, a local authority, challenging the orders of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Notary Certificate for Violation of Natural Justice. Impugned order set aside as it was passed without show-cause notice and without affording opportunity of hearing, in contravention of Notaries Act, 1952 and Notaries Rules, 1956.

The Petitioner, Mr. Lalit Doshi, a practicing Advocate since 1971 and a Notary Public since 2004 appointed by the Central Government, challenged an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...