Search Results for "Rule 222"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State’s Appeal, Sets Aside Single Judge’s Order for Retrospective Promotion under G.O.Ms.No.1170. Court holds that relaxation of service rules is discretionary, cannot be claimed as right, and cannot be applied retrospectively after retirement.

The matter arose from a service dispute wherein a Panchayat Assistant, appointed in 1979 and later transferred as Junior Assistant in 1999 under a 10%...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Jurisdictional Challenge in Admiralty Suit Filed Without Vessel in Territorial Waters. Suit Held Maintainable When Arrest Warrant Executed upon Vessel's Subsequent Arrival, Following Geetanjali Woolen Precedent.

The case involves an admiralty suit in rem filed by Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong company, against the vessel M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeal and Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claim. The case concerns enhancement of compensation awarded by MACT and the maintainability of cross objections under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The present matter arises from a fatal road accident on 25.07.2011, when Jose Leandro Souza, a 38-year-old welder and agricultural labourer, was struc...