Search Results for "Rent control protection"

541 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 541 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Interim Maintenance for Wife Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband's Income and Lifestyle Considered. The Court held that interim maintenance must reflect the husband's earning capacity and standard of living, not merely the wife's needs.

The petitioner, Smt. Pratibha Singh, wife of the respondent Vineet Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Port Trust Demurrage Circular for Lack of Authority. Traffic Manager Cannot Levy Demurrage Without TAMP Approval Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The petitioners, M/s Kundil Sponge Iron Limited and its director Vijay Kashyap, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company Application Seeking Recall of Winding Up Petition Admission Order Against Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Company Court Has No Power to Recall or Review Its Own Order Admitting a Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956.

The applicant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, filed an application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking recall of the order dated 30.10...