Search Results for "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act"

477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Parole Petition for NDPS Convict Due to Statutory Bar Under Section 32A. Mother's plea for 90-day general parole for son convicted under NDPS Act rejected as Section 32A prohibits suspension or remission of sentence.

The petitioner, mother of a convict named Saddam (CTP No.4426), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Ordinary Leave to NDPS Convict Due to Bar Under Prison Rule 21(h)(3). Court Holds Convict Under NDPS Act Not Entitled to Ordinary Leave and No Extraordinary Circumstances Shown to Invoke Rule 40 Discretion.

The writ petition was filed by the wife of a convict under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order — Cases Triable Under Ordinary Law. Preventive detention under Prohibition Act and NDPS Act not justified when ordinary law is sufficient.

The petitioner, Jansirani, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court seeking to quash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Parole for Convict in NDPS Case Despite Bar Under Section 32A — Distinguishes Parole from Remission. The Court held that Section 32A of NDPS Act does not bar parole as parole is a temporary release for a specific purpose and not a remission or suspension of sentence.

The petitioner, Arjun S/o Lakkappa Hurakannavar, a convict under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), was serving his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Medical Superintendent. Petitioner's claim for promotion to Medical Superintendent post rejected as Selection Committee's decision was based on seniority and merit, and no mala fides were established.

The petitioner, Dr. H.S. Sathish, a Professor and Head of the Department of ENT at Sri Venkateswara ENT Institute, Victoria Hospital, Bangalore Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Acquittal of Accused for Possession of Charas Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Accused Were Informed of Their Right to Be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(1) — Information Not Reduced to Writing and No Intimation to Superior Officer Before Raid. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provision of Section 42(1) of NDPS Act Vitiates Trial and Conviction.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appellants, Mahabubi ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Failure to Record Grounds of Belief and Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer Renders Seizure Illegal.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appell...