Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petition Due to Non-Application of Correct Market Value. Petitioner's Land Acquired in 2008 for Satara Municipal Council, Court Directs Recalculation Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, owned land in Satara that was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Satara Municipal Council under the Land Acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Project Despite Procedural Lapses. Court Holds That Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was Unjustified but Refuses to Quash Notification in Public Interest.

The two writ petitions were filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challenging land ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Inaction of Planning Authority. Reservation Lapses When Planning Authority Fails to Take Steps for Acquisition Within Six Months of Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Motilal Hirakhanwala, owned lands bearing Survey No. 386 (2.78 H) and Survey No. 389 (1.23 H) within the limits of Jalna Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MCGM to Construct Public Toilet on Reserved Plot, Sets Aside Injunction. Trial Court's Interim Order Restraining Construction of Public Toilet on CTS No. 418 Was Passed Without Considering Statutory Reservation Under MRTP Act and DCR 33.

The case involves an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Defendant No. 1) against an interim injunction granted by the City Civil C...