Search Results for "unregistered document"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "unregistered document"

516 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Not Proved, Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness. The court set aside the decree for specific performance and refund of advance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff did not prove the execution of the agreement or his continuous readiness and willingness.

2 Apr 2026

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale. The plaintiff/respondent claimed that on 14.09.2015, the defendants/ap...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Found Not Genuine Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Unregistered Document. Court Holds That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness and That the Agreement Was Not a Valid Contract Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

5 Mar 2026

The appellant/defendant, Mohamed Haja Moideen, appealed against the judgment and decree dated 13.08.2018 passed by the District Court, Karaikal in O.S...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Confirms Plaintiff's Title and Right to Recovery of Possession. Partition Deed and Revenue Records Establish Ownership; Permissive Occupation Revocable at Will.

22 Jan 2025

The second appeal arose from a suit for declaration, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction filed by the plaintiff K.Saroja Ammal against the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

23 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition Among Muslim Heirs. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Petitioners Entitled to Joint Possession as Co-Sharers Under Muslim Personal Law.

5 Jul 2023

The petitioners, legal representatives of Syed Mohiuddin Ali @ Modin Ali, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entry made in the revenue rec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Purchasers' Rights Not Affected by Prior Decree. The court held that a consent decree in a previous suit does not bind purchasers who were not parties to that suit, and the suit for partition was maintainable as the property was joint family property.

1 Feb 2022

The case involves a second appeal filed by defendants 4 and 5, who were purchasers of the property, against the judgment and decree in R.A. No. 04/201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Rejection Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that only plaint averments are relevant for rejection and limitation is a mixed question of fact.

2 Jan 2018

The appellant, as plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 26.11.1984 executed by A. Gundappa in respect of four...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Partnership Firm in BBMP Property Dispute — Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition of Building Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

6 Sep 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Raghava Reddy and Associates, a partnership firm, along with its partners, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for declaration of ownership and challenge to will dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

16 Oct 2014

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ag...

44 45 46 47 48

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)