Search Results for "substantial breach"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "substantial breach"

2149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2149 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Company Law Dispute Over Shareholding and Project Implementation. Parties Agreed to Settle Dispute and Withdraw Appeal, Resulting in Dismissal Without Adjudication on Merits.

13 Jan 2005

The present appeal was filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 against an order of the Company Law Board dated 8.12.2000. The dispute perta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Zilla Parishad's Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Confirms Decree for Possession. Suit Not Barred by Limitation Under Article 112 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Government Body is Not a 'Government' for Purposes of That Article.

30 Apr 2015

The respondent, Shrirang Wadguji Wanjari, purchased land including Survey No.34/2003 via a registered sale deed dated 23 December 1986. He alleged tha...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal by Nagar Seva Sadan in Specific Performance Suit — Resolution of Local Authority Does Not Constitute a Concluded Contract; Suit Barred by Limitation and Non-Joinder of Government as Necessary Party. The court held that a resolution of a local authority cannot be equated with a concluded contract for specific performance, and the suit was barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963, and the government was a necessary party.

29 Jan 2026

The appellant, Nagar Seva Sadan, Mangrol, was the original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 02 of 2010 filed by the respondent, Motivarash Premjibh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme for Koli Fisherfolk Community — No Locus Standi Found as Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Interest in the Subject Land. The Court Held That the Petitioners, Being Societies Not Directly Affected by the Development, Could Not Maintain a Public Interest Litigation for Alleged Violations of CRZ Norms and Fisheries Act.

16 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Danda Koli Masemari Vyavasayik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and Danda Koli Samaj, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

20 Sep 2022

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Agreement to Sell Despite Non-Payment of Balance Consideration. Court Holds That Time Was Not of Essence in Absence of Express Stipulation and That Possession Delivered Under Agreement Constitutes Part Performance.

16 Dec 2005

The dispute arose out of an agreement to sell dated 1st June 1978 executed by the original defendant No.2 (since deceased, represented by appellants) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of School Employees Without Mandatory Notice Under Rule 25A of MEPS Rules, 1981. Termination of Class IV employees by school management without three months advance notice as required by Rule 25A of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is illegal; compensation in lieu of reinstatement granted.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Mrs. Gangubai Madhukar Jagdhane and Mrs. Jaivantabai Motiram Naik, were appointed as Class IV employees in a school established and m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Manager for Misconduct in Loan Sanctions. Disciplinary Proceedings Valid as Charges of Failing to Exercise Due Diligence and Integrity in Sanctioning Loans Were Established, and Penalty Not Disproportionate.

25 Oct 2016

The petitioner, R.M. Yadav, was a Branch Manager at Bank of India's Agardanda branch. In 2003, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him for...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Manager in Disciplinary Proceedings — Charges of Financial Irregularities and Lack of Integrity Proven. The Court held that the disciplinary authority's findings were based on evidence and the penalty of compulsory retirement was proportionate to the misconduct under the Bank of India Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976.

25 Oct 2016

The petitioner, R.M. Yadav, was a Branch Manager at Bank of India's Agardanda branch. In 2003, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him bas...

44 45 46 47 48

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)