Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Employee for Unauthorized Occupation of Railway Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Title or Permission for Construction, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition.

The petitioner, B.S. Rath, joined Western Railway as an Apprentice on 15th February 1965 and later became a Senior Motorman. He was charged with unaut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata

The applicants (defendants in the suit) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court's order dated 30.09.2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Purchaser Pendente Lite Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Binds Transferee to Decree, Making Impleadment Unnecessary.

The petitioner, Sri T.S. Mahadevaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.1.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Deposit Condition in Commercial Suit — Upholds Order Requiring Defendant to Deposit Rs.1.5 Crore for Reconsideration of Earlier Condition. Court Held That Imposition of Deposit Condition Was Not Arbitrary and Defendant Failed to Show Any Change in Circumstances.

The appellant, Sunil B. Bhosale, was the original defendant in Suit No.4351 of 1996 filed by the respondent, Kamal Organic Chemicals, a division of Ki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application for Annulment Filed 21 Years After Act Commencement and 30 Years After Transaction Deemed Unreasonable Despite Absolute Alienation Bar Under Rule 43(8) of Mysore Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal concerning land originally granted to a Scheduled Caste beneficiary in 1941 under the Mysore Land Revenue Code....