Search Results for "section 376"

1813 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1813 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor — Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Devanand Rajabhau More, was convicted by the Special Court, Ambajogai, in Special POCSO Case No. 4/2014 for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder by Setting Wife on Fire. Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Suicide Defense Raised.

The appeal arose from the judgment dated 16 May 2013 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 235 of 2011, convicting the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Cases — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. The court held that the Tribunal erred in assessing income without evidence and in fixing contributory negligence without proper basis.

The case involves three first appeals filed by the United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the common judgment and award of the Motor Accident Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Consent and Voluntary Relationship. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Stay and Marriage-Like Relationship with Accused Negates Offences Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Pintukumar @ Jitendrakumar Chedilal Girigosavi, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Vitiation. Promise to Marry Not Proven as Sole Basis for Sexual Relations Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Jagdish Raghunath Mankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No.256 of 1996 for the offence puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...