Search Results for "receiver appointment"

573 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 573 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute Over Arbitral Interim Order. Court Holds That an Order Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Is Not an 'Award' Under Article 11 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Thus No Stamp Duty Is Payable.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Invocation of Performance Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute — Finds Prima Facie Case of Fraud and Irretrievable Injustice. Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked to protect petitioner's interests pending arbitration.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty on Arbitrator's Interim Order. The court held that an order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not an 'award' under Article 11 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and thus no stamp duty is payable.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Partition Suit Appeal — Order I Rule 10 CPC. Subsequent purchaser held to be necessary and proper party to appeal under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioner, Sri Basavaraj @ Madhu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...