Search Results for "ready forward"

1139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Claim of Automatic Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Argued That Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period After Purchase Notice Entitled Them to Release From Reservation.

The petitions arose from the reservation of land in Andheri, Mumbai, for a public garden under successive development plans. The petitioner, Mehtab La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Return to Paper Ballots or 100% VVPAT Counting in Elections. Court Upholds EVMs with VVPAT as Sufficiently Transparent and Reliable, Rejects Allegations of Manipulation Without Evidence.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms and others seeking various directions regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bail Cancellation in NDPS Act Case Due to Narco-Terrorism Links. Transfer of Investigation to NIA and Framing of Charges Under UAPA Justify Custodial Interrogation for Thorough Investigation.

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and Writ Petition filed by Ankush Vipan Kapoor, challenging the cancellation of his bail by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...