Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order Declaring Kishanrao Kadam as Tenant; Landlord Relies on Earlier Civil Decree and Findings of Tenancy Authorities
4 Jul 2012...
Search Results for "put option deed"
602 result(s) found
Found 602 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.
28 Oct 2021The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...
- 424
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MSFC Petition Under SFC Act for Recovery of Loan Against Borrower and Guarantors — Personal Guarantors Cannot Escape Liability Despite Company's Sickness. The court held that the liability of personal guarantors under Section 31 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 is independent of the borrower's financial condition.
28 Feb 2005The Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC) filed a Miscellaneous Petition under Sections 31, 31(1)(aa), and 32 of the State Financial Corporat...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Property Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Not Made Out as Dispute Pertained to Non-Payment of Rent Under Leave and License Agreement.
5 Jun 2017The applicants, Dr. Arun Kumar Barthakur and Basant Kumar Jain, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Declares Demolition of Shop without Notice Illegal under Section 23 of Karnataka State Highways Act, 1964. Tenant's Possession Protected When Authorities Demolish Building Without Following Procedural Mandate.
4 Jul 2024The petitioner was a tenant running a textile shop in a building at Magadi Town, measuring 19 feet by 76 feet, referred to as Schedule-B property. He ...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Trust's Appeal in Public Trusts Act Case Due to Registrar's Erroneous Application of Discretionary Power. Registrar's Rejection of Sanction for Sale of Trust Properties Was Invalid as It Was Based on Cultural Preservation Concerns Rather Than Assessment of Prejudice to Trust's Interest Under Section 14 of Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951.
28 Jan 2022The dispute involved a public trust registered under the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951, seeking sanction to sell five of its immovable proper...
- 1236
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal Against Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Liberal Approach to Allowing Amendment for Enhancing Damages After 31 Years Upheld, with Issue of Limitation Kept Open for Trial Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
1 Sep 2022The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, where the appellant, Life Insurance Corporation of India,...
- 2050
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Farmers' Insurance Claim in Cold Storage Fire — Insurer Liable Despite No Privity of Contract. Farmers are Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and Insurance Company Must Pay for Loss of Stored Agricultural Produce.
31 Jan 2020The case involves multiple appeals arising from a common order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission regarding a fire that occurred o...
- 307
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Developer's Suit to Restrain Invocation of Bank Guarantee — No Prima Facie Case of Fraud or Irreparable Injury Established. The court held that an unconditional bank guarantee cannot be restrained except in cases of established fraud or irretrievable injustice, which the plaintiff failed to prove.
22 May 2020The plaintiff, Kryshnajay Developers Private Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the invocation of a bank guarantee by the defendants (Ka...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Partnership and Dismissal of Suit for Accounts. Court holds that mere sharing of profits does not establish a partnership under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of a partnership agreement.
27 Mar 2015The appellant, Prem Kaliaandas Daryanani, filed a suit for dissolution of partnership and accounts against the respondents, alleging that they were pa...
- 72
