Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent injunction and possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now respondents) against the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Appellants' claim of tenancy rights and adverse possession fails for lack of evidence and inconsistent pleadings.

The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed by the unsuccessful defendants (appellants) against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction Simpliciter Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession Over Disputed Strip of Land.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for permanent injunction simpliciter against the respondents (original defendants) claiming that the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Declaration of Title — Remand Order Set Aside for Failure to Decide Limitation and Jurisdiction Issues. First Appellate Court Must Decide All Issues Before Remanding Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.

The present appeal from order was filed by the original defendants challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned District Judge-12, Auranga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Decree for Non-Compliance with Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Pay Balance Consideration, Rendering Specific Performance Unwarranted.

The case involves a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendant No. 2 (appellant) challenging ...