OSA. No. 16 of 2023
24 Mar 2025The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras arose out of a construction contract dispute between Tamil Nadu Housing Board (the employer) ...
Search Results for "intra‑court appeal"
958 result(s) found
Found 958 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Dearness Allowance and Dearness Relief Equality in Favor of Retired Employees. Differential Enhancement Rates Between Serving and Retired Employees Found Discriminatory Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as Object of Offsetting Inflation Applies Equally to Both Groups.
10 Apr 2026The dispute arose from retired employees of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) filing writ petitions challenging the differential rat...
- 615
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Reforms Case — Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenant. Third Party Trust's Challenge to Tribunal's Order Dismissed as Not Maintainable Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
2 Apr 2024The appellant, T. Venkateshalu, filed an application in Form No.1 on 06.12.1983 before the Land Tribunal, Hosapete Taluk, claiming occupancy rights in...
- 207
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings — Dismissal Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court held that the disciplinary authority failed to provide adequate opportunity to the employee to cross-examine witnesses and that the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the misconduct alleged.
4 Jun 2024The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by Vijaya Bank (the employer) against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 15.10.2003 in Writ Petiti...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
4 Jan 2013The appellant, Ashok Muralidhar Jagtap, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Shobha. The prosecution case was that on 5.1.20...
- 42
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Cooperative Society's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Employee in Higher Post — Reversion Upheld Due to Lack of Prescribed Qualifications and Service Period Under Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Rules. The court held that promotion to Secretary/General Manager requires a degree and six years of service as Manager under Rule 149, and the employee's promotion was invalid.
22 Jun 2026The case involves an intra-court appeal by the President of LIC Employees Co-operative Bank Ltd. against a writ order dated 30.03.2023 in W.P.No.3083 ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, 325, 324, 452 r/w 149 of IPC in a Village Faction Murder Case; Holds That Evidence of Interested Witnesses Cannot Be Mechanically Rejected and Must Be Evaluated Cautiously
6 Aug 2013The appeals arose from a judgment dated September 24, 2009, passed by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in Sessions Case No. 109 of 2003, convicting 13 ...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Gang-Related Assault Case. Court Confirms Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC for Fatal Stabbing and 10 Years Under Section 307 IPC for Injuring Victim, Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.
11 Jun 2024The case arises from an incident on 22nd March 2011, where the deceased Suraj @ Balu Shabbir Magdum and injured Rohan Sakate (PW-3) were assaulted by ...
- 453
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging Reservation in Promotion for Hyderabad-Karnataka Region Under Article 371J. The Court Held That Article 371J(1)(b) and (c) Include Reservation in Promotion for Local Candidates in Public Services.
6 Aug 2019The appellants, Smt. A.S. Vimalakshi and Sri R. Shivakumar, were employees of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly Secretariat. They filed writ petition...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.
9 Mar 2015The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...
- 296
