CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 452
14 Aug 2014Multiple writ petitions and a criminal application were filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging police actions of raiding or sto...
Search Results for "exclusive marks"
457 result(s) found
Found 457 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Kidnapping and Rape of Minor; Investigative Lapses and Witness Credibility Scrutinized. The Court examines the chain of circumstantial evidence, including last seen theory, recoveries, and forensic reports, amidst glaring investigative flaws and witness contradictions.
1 Jan 1970The case before the Supreme Court of India concerns the conviction of Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar for the brutal sexual assault of a four-year-old girl...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The Court Examines Whether the Trial Court Erred in Convicting the Accused on Inconsistent Motive Evidence and Weak Circumstantial Links.
7 Aug 2006The appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, aged 24 years, under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment and fine by the trial cour...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.
7 Aug 2006This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.
22 Dec 2005The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Larger Bench Examines Nature of Parole and Validity of Proviso to Rule 19(2) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Challenge to Proviso Restricting Parole to Once a Year Based on Articles 14 and 21 Referred to Larger Bench After Earlier Division Bench Upheld Validity in Gajanan Babulal Bathulwar v. State of Maharashtra.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, a life convict undergoing sentence for offences under the Indian Penal Code, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his pa...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Refusal to Quash Dowry Death Proceedings on Alibi Grounds. Official Duty Certificate Proving Absence and Parents' Acquittal Raises Questions of Abuse of Process Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 Jan 1970This appeal by special leave arises from the High Court's order dated 12.12.2025 dismissing the appellant's application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seek...
- 35
