WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011
7 Mar 2012The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...
Search Results for "excess supply"
815 result(s) found
Found 815 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Letter of Credit Dispute; Upholds Autonomy of Irrevocable Credits — No Fraud or Modification Established to Justify Interference. Irrevocable Letter of Credit Held Independent of Underlying Sale Contract and Not Subject to Injunction Absent Exceptional Circumstances Under Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits.
26 Nov 1968The dispute arose from a contract between an Indian firm (appellant) and a Russian firm (respondent) for the supply of construction machinery for the ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Workmen in Retrenchment Compensation Claim Against Electricity Company Under Industrial Disputes Act. Transfer of Undertaking to State Government Did Not Satisfy Section 25FF Proviso Conditions; Workmen Deemed Retrenched and Entitled to Compensation from Previous Employer.
25 Nov 1968The dispute arose out of the transfer of an electricity distribution undertaking owned by the South Arcot Electricity Distribution Company Limited to ...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Cross Petitions on Industrial Court's Decision Regarding Permanency of Temporary Municipal Workers. The Determination Turns on Compliance with BPMC Act and MRTU & PULP Act, Including Model Standing Order 4C.
7 Jun 2010The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from a complaint filed by temporary workers of Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation under the Mahara...
Supreme Court
Legal Battle Over Insurance Claim: NCDRC Decision Challenged Navigating the complexities of insurance law and contract disputes in the wake of a construction project gone awry.
16 May 2024Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Insurance Law; Contract Law; Construction Contract Dispute The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...
- 444
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Rent Default. Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Over a Decade, No Dispute as to Standard Rent or Permitted Increases, Case Falls Under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act.
24 Sep 2024The dispute pertains to a suit for eviction filed by the landlady, Mrs. Kusum Pandurang Keni, against the tenant, Sudhir Kumar Sengupta (since decease...
- 1099
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.
17 Apr 2023The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...
- 348
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.
24 Oct 2019The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...
- 227
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Application Under Indian Forest Act. Minister's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider material evidence regarding agricultural character of land.
23 Aug 2023The petitioner, Vijayalaxmi Shrinivas Panditrao, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 20th August, 2019 passe...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of TUFS Guidelines and Export Obligation Extension Policy. Court upholds Textile Commissioner's power to impose conditions for extension of export obligation period under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) and holds that guidelines are not ultra vires the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by textile exporters challenging the validity of guidelines issued by the Textile Commissioner under t...
- 71
