Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Employment Dispute Despite Alleged Full and Final Settlement. Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Contract and Dispute Regarding Settlement Must Be Decided by Arbitrator.

The applicant, Akshat Madan, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exemption Order Under ULC Act Due to Reservation in Development Plan — Petitioner Failed to Implement Scheme Despite Exemption, No Ground for Modification After Repeal of ULC Act.

The petitioner, Smt. Sitabai Ramchandra Lonkar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation by MHADA in Redevelopment Project. Court Holds That Cancellation Before Opening of Price Bids Is Not Arbitrary When Done in Public Interest and for Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Private Limited and its director, challenged the cancellation of an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Restores Compensation. Functional Integrality between two companies established, making them jointly liable for unfair labour practices under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

The appeal was filed by workmen against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who had set aside the order of the Industrial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...