Search Results for "bribe"

753 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 753 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Failure to Prove Public Servant Status. Trial Court's finding that accused was not a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, despite acceptance of bribe amount, leads to acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Nagorao Vithobaji Motghare, a Line Helper with M.S.E.B., for offences under Sections 7, 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Head Constable under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Upheld Due to Inconsistent Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23/3/1990 passed by the Special Judge, Sangli in Special Case No.8 of 1986, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Applicant Not Named in FIR in Murder Case. Applicant Alleged Illegal Detention and Bribe Demand by Investigating Officer Under Section 438 CrPC.

The applicant, Sureshkumar Ishwarlal Chordiya, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav, a Talathi (public servant) in Dafalapur, Sangli, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sangli, for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The appellant, Sharad s/o Namdeorao Shirbhate, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amravati in Special Case No.7 of 1988 for offences under...