Search Results for "Revision power"

4395 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4395 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Winding-Up Order Against Co-operative Housing Society for Violation of Natural Justice. Final order under Section 103 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside as interim order was never communicated to society before confirmation.

The petitioner, Panchshil Co-Operative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Juvenile in Heinous POCSO Case — Trial as Adult Upheld. Mental Capacity and Circumstances of Offence Justify Transfer Under Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Despite Procedural Delays.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by Mustafa Kha: Jabbar Kha (CCL No.1) challenging the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Eviction Decree in Bonafide Requirement Case — Landlord's Failure to Lead Personal Evidence Proves Fatal. Constituted Attorney's Evidence Held Insufficient to Prove Bonafide Requirement Under Section 115 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (tenants) against the judgment and decree of the appellate court confirming the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...