Search Results for "Part consideration"

21254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance Appeal Despite Unproven Part Payment. Failure to Prove Payment of Rs.300 Does Not Justify Refusal of Specific Performance When Plaintiff Shows Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6th June 1974, whereby the respondent-defendant agreed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Based on Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence. Section 106 of Evidence Act Shifts Burden on Husband for Wife's Death in Matrimonial Home.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of Balveer Singh by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The case involved the murder of Biren...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Child Witness. High Court's Reversal of Conviction Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Foundational Facts for Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Balveer Singh, who was originally convicted by the trial court f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes of Appeals and Revision in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 8 of Goa Children's Act, 2003, was Challenged by Accused, and State Appealed Against Set-Off under Section 428 CrPC.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard together five criminal appeals and one criminal revision application arising from the judgment and order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutionality of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, in Malegaon Blast Case. Petitioners Challenged Legislative Competence and Transfer of Investigation Without State Consent, Arguing Encroachment on State Police Powers.

The matter arose from two criminal writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows PILs Challenging Vice-Chancellor Appointment Due to Flawed Qualification Assessment. Search Committee's Non-Application of Mind to Essential Qualifications under Statutory Order Issued under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Vitiated Selection.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai, which was assailed through three public interest litigation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Public Interest Litigation on Snake Capture Festival. Court Clarifies that Temporary Capture of Protected Snakes Constitutes Hunting and is Prohibited Under Section 9 of the Act.

The case involved a public interest litigation filed by activists seeking enforcement of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 against the villagers of ...